Cutting Edge Insights
with Dr. Lee

Something Turned 50 Yesterday

Something, not someone.

Yesterday (August 15th, 2021) was the 50-year anniversary of then-U.S. President Richard Nixon removing the country from the gold standard.

There were several items in his now-infamous speech on that warm summer night, but the most notable was the “temporary” discontinuation of convertibility of U.S. dollars to gold.

This maneuver was initiated because the United States had more foreign debt than it would have been able to redeem at the Congressional-established gold price of $35 per ounce.

Nixon and Congress knew that the tide was going out, and they didn’t want to be caught swimming naked (reference to a famous Warren Buffet quote).

In essence, this was a change in foreign policy. Yes, there were some other domestic economic measures introduced that evening, but nothing that produced the same long-lasting effects.

The result was that the U.S. dollar became a fiat currency, or one that is legislated into existence and is backed by nothing. “A dollar is worth a dollar because we say it is,” has been the country’s mantra since.

On that warm summer night, the door to printing money was opened, the likes of which have seen no limit as of late.

The dollar has no intrinsic, or underlying, value.

Q: Is that why Robert Kiyosaki has been known to say, “Cash is trash”, and “Savers are losers”?

A: Yes. We’ll unpack those a little more thoroughly in the future.

Q: What about considering things that do have intrinsic value? Commodities, land, food?

A: Isn’t it ironic how we measure their value in dollars?

Q: What would home prices look like if we measured their value in some other denomination?

A: Hang on….

The prices of commodities have been tracked historically. In 1971, a unit of corn cost $120 (measured in U.S. dollars) while in 2021, it was $665.63.

Similar research and historical price discovery can be done for all commodities – soybeans, lumber, gold, etc.

We know that the average home price in 1971 was $26,395 denominated in dollars of that day, and is somewhere around $325,000 in 2021.

We tend to think that the home price has risen dramatically, especially lately and of course over 50 years, but sometimes we lose context of any meaningful comparison because we always think in denominations of dollars.

But what if we compared the price of a home over time to a commodity of real value, not dollars?

Then we would conclude that:

In 1971, we could have purchased a home with 220 units of corn. In 2021, it took 488 units of corn.

Yes, a home costs more in 2021 compared to 1971 even when measured in corn. But measured in corn, it did a little more than double, while in dollars, it went up by a factor of greater than 10.

How about buying a home with soybeans? 80 units in 1971 and 240 units in 2021.

Lumber? 240 units in 1971 and 656 units in August 2021 (using the price of $495.00 per 1,000 board feet, not the astronomical peak of May 2021).

Gold? 754 ounces in 1971 and 183 ounces in 2021. (Wow. Hanging onto a “house” worth of gold in 1971 would buy you over 4 houses in 2021).

Cotton #2? 825 units in 1971 and 3,457 units in 2021.

Q: What is the take home message here?

A: I think there can be several. Here are my top 3:

First, and perhaps controversial, is the idea that a home in the United States actually hasn’t gone up in price over 50 years as much as our dollar has gone down, when we compare to commodities that command a real value. I know this idea will cause some dissonance, but I’m going on record as saying that homes are relatively inexpensive.

Second is the idea that if you follow mainstream media for your financial advice and education, you will be inclined to believe anything you are told.

Third – the dollar isn’t going anywhere but down. The U.S. government is eyeing our current inflationary environment like a kid in a candy store. It wants inflation to occur in order to devalue the tremendous increase in debt it has created.

The moral of the story is to always perform your own due diligence and discovery. Things often aren’t as they seem.

As you think about that, remember that real estate remains the consummate asset class because 1) it will always have real value and 2) it will always be in demand (people and businesses will always need a home).

For more information on how investing in real estate can extricate you from the rat race of business or a job, download our ebook below.

Until next time,

Dr. Lee Newton


The Business Owner’s Blueprint For Building Wealth

How to strategically construct a wealth plan that goes to work for you

  • Learn Why Relying Only On Your Business Won’t Prepare You For The Future
  • Discover A Little-Known Financial Asset That Produces Cash Flow Today
  • Uncover The Best Investment Strategy That Gives Business Owners The Edge


Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Something Turned 50 Yesterday


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

The Essence of Value Engineering

The following is Investopedia’s definition of Value Engineering: Value engineering is a systematic, organized approach to providing necessary functions in a project at the lowest

Read More »